norton antivirus server edition
Symantec Corporated Edition or McAfee Total Protection?
I manage a network that is made up of 1 file server running Windows Server 2003 x64 and 8 workstations running Windows XP Professional. I currently use Symantec Antivirus 10.2 and Norton Antivirus. I am thinking about switching to McAfee Total Protection. Has anyone used this product? I want to be able to manage all pc’s from one location (the file server). I'm not interested in anti-spam or firewall proctection. I already have that taken care of... just antivirus. McAfee sounds like it is cheaper and a lot easier to add additional licenses. I can purchase a minimum of 2 licenses versus a minimum of 5 with Symantec. Are there any performance issues? I know Symantec can be a memory hog. How does McAfee compare? Any help would be greatly appreciated. P.S. I’m only interested in these two products. I’m not interested in AVG or any other type of AV. Thanks.
Yes I have checked out the TOPS service. That's what I was leaning towards. Thanks for your help guys!
Out of the two, McAfee is the better product. It doesn't impose itself into your computer like Symantec. Even after you uninstall Symantec there's always bits left over, not with McAfee.
Plus, McAfee doesn't use as many resources as Symantec does. It uses more than most free AVs, like AVG and Avast, but if you only want one fo these two, go for McAfee.
[phpzon]norton antivirus server edition, 5, Electronics[/phpzon]
[phpbay]norton antivirus server edition, 30, "11211"[/phpbay]
homemade Norton Antivirus commercial